Category Archives: DUI Checkpoints

Apple Bans DUI Checkpoint / Roadblock App.

Massachusetts state and local police routinely set up DUI checkpoints on major and secondary roads throughout Massachusetts to detect and arrest drivers who are under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Use of these checkpoints is likely to increase during the summer months.  The law requires that these checkpoints be announced in advance. However, only the county is identified.

To help motorists avoid drunk driving checkpoints and roadblocks, blackberry, Droid, iPhone, and other smart phone application developers have created various applications or “apps.” which are used to warn drivers of the location of DWI sobriety checkpoints. Critics of the controversial DUI roadblock apps. claim that they endanger public safety by allowing drunk drivers to escape detection. Proponents claim that the apps. actually enhance public safety by publicizing the checkpoints. The apps. also warn drivers of red light camera, speed traps, radar locations, and the like.

In response to pressure from a group of United States Senators, Apple has decided to block DUI apps. from the Apple Store. This means that Apple iPhone and iPad users will not be allowed to download them from approved app. distribution channels. Only checkpoints which are specifically announced and identified by law enforcement will be allowed to be published.

Bridgewater State University Police Conduct DUI Roadblock

Bridgewater State University Police conducted an on-campus operating under the influence sobriety check point on Wednesday, April 20th, according to the University newspaper, “The Comment.” Officers apparently checked the sobriety of drivers and distributed informational handouts to motorists and passengers.

University Police reported making three arrests for DUI, drugs, and other traffic violations. The police also issued civil citations for students found to be in possession of marijuana. The Police Department conducted the checkpoint because of the increase in alcohol related arrests which typically comes with warmer weather.

In order for these checkpoint arrests to be valid, the officers must have adhered to established protocols which limit their discretion. Adherence to the protocols is required because being stopped at a DUI roadblock represents an invasion of privacy and the police must act in as non-intrusively as possible under the circumstances.

The Massachusetts State Police as well as local police will be conducting more sobriety roadblocks and checkpoints across the state throughout the summer months.

In a letter to the editor, Ms. Sarah Longwell, the Managing Director of the American Beverage Institute criticized the practice of conducting DUI sobriety checkpoints, citing a University of Maryland Study which was conducted in 2009.

Mass. State Police Make Arrests at Weekend DUI Roadblock

The Salem News reported today that Massachusetts State Troopers out of the Danvers Barracks made numerous drunk driving and other arrests at a DUI roadblock on Route 1 over the weekend. In total, seven people were arrested. Most were charged with operating under the influence and some others were charged with driving on a suspended or revoked license. The State Police usually conduct these roadblocks on major secondary routes on Friday and Saturday nights.  Some companies have developed controversial iPhone and Blackberry apps. to alert drivers to the location of these OUI checkpoints.

Stopping a motorist at a roadblock constitutes an invasion of privacy. However, Massachusetts courts have upheld the use of these OUI roadblocks and sobriety check points as a legitimate law enforcement response to detect and deter drivers who may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Society’s interest in public safety overrides the motorist’s privacy interests. However, for DUI roadblocks to be legal, there must be limits placed on the discretion of the police officers and troopers conducting them. Written guidelines are required and the roadblocks must be announced in advance. A violation of the guidelines or laws applicable to roadblocks may result in exclusion of evidence, a not guilty verdict after trial, or a dismissal of the DWI charges.

If you have been stopped and arrested for DUI at a Massachusetts roadblock or checkpoint, I urge you to contact a skilled and experienced DUI defense lawyer at 508-656-0057. An initial consultation will cost you nothing and you will likely feel much better after speaking with an attorney.

DUI Roadblock in Shrewsbury, Mass. Tonight

The Massachusetts State Police and the Shrewsbury Police Department conducted a field sobriety checkpoint on Route 9 in the area of the White City Plaza in Shrewsbury, Mass. tonight.

So long as these OUI checkpoints are conducted in a certain manner, they are legally permitted. The goal of these checkpoints is to detect and arrest drivers who are under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Officers assigned to these drunk driving checkpoints use a “BAT Mobile” which is a large vehicle which is equipped with breathalyzers, computers, spotlights, and mobile DUI booking facilities. For Mass. DUI sobriety checkpoint arrests to be legitimate, the police officers conducting the checkpoint must follow a strict set of legal guidelines. For example, the date and general location of the checkpoint must be announced in advance and police officers cannot randomly or arbitrarily select drivers for further investigation at a DUI roadblock. However, if a state trooper or police officer smells the odor of alcoholic beverages on a driver’s breath or in a driver’s vehicle, that smell alone provides reasonable suspicion that the suspect may be driving under the influence and the police can legally ask the driver to perform field sobriety evaluations such as the one-legged stand, heel to toe test, the horizontal gasze nystagmus (HGN), and a portable breath test (PBT). Other indicators of alcohol intoxication which can subject a driver to field sobriety testing at a checkpoint include glassy, bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, or a container of alcohol in plain view. During the initial contact with a motorist, an officer at sobriety checkpoint cannot ask the driver if he or she had been drinking, unless there is some independent clue to suggest that driver was operating under the influence.

Judging by the four (4) tow trucks at the scene of the DUI roadblock, it appears as if DUI arrests were made and vehicles were towed from the scene. The unlucky drivers who were arrested will be required to appear in Westboro Dist. Court on Monday morning for arraignment. With the weather improving, these checkpoints are likely to be conducted with increasing frequency on weekend nights.

Controversy Surrounds DUI App.

News media sources across the country are reporting how people are using their Droids and iphones and other Smartphones to avoid DUI drunk driving checkpoints.

Using a controversial App. called Phantom Alert, which is a paid service, drivers can learn the location of DUI roadblocks and field sobriety checkpoints. Apparently Phantom Alert was designed to help drivers avoid traffic cameras, speed traps, and electronic traffic enforcement devices. Now, the app. will alert drivers to the locations of police drunk driving checkpoints.

Law enforcement claims, rightfully, that the software is undermining their DUI enforcement efforts and the police purposefully do not reveal the exact locations of drunk driving checkpoints, so that people cannot plan their routes to avoid them. Here in Massachusetts, for example, the Mass. State Police will announce only that a checkpoint is being conducted on a major or secondary road in a particular county. The exact location is never revealed in advance.

The developers of the Phantom Alert software claim that providing warnings regarding the DUI checkpoints actually enhances and does not undermine anti-drunk driving efforts.  Phantom Alert invites the police to notify them of the checkpoint locations so they can advise motorists. Proponents of the apps. claim that they promote public awareness and public safety much like a radar detector would cause a person to slow down when police traffic radar is being used.

The DUI detection app. Controversy has reached the United States Senate, where senators are calling for the apps. to be removed from on-line stores. Apparently, due to political pressure, the app. Will not be available for blackberries. However, the apps such as Trapster are still available on Apple’s iphone and Google Android Smartphones.

There is also a much less controversial iphone app. which is designed to calculate a user’s approximate blood alcohol content and warn the person if he or she is over the legal limit, which in Massachusetts is .08.

Leandra’s Law Requires Ignition Interlock Device for DUI Offenders in NY

The State of New York has recently passed a tough new DUI Law entitled Leandra’s Law. This will mandate the use of the breath alcohol ignition interlock device for all New York DUI offenders, unless a judge makes specific findings that the DUI offender has no prior record of alcoholism. In Massachusetts,Senate Bill 1925 will dramatically strengthen Melanie’s Law by requiring Massachusetts DUI first offenders to use the device as well. However, there will be no exceptions to the mandatory interlock requirement here.

In addition to requiring the use of the interlock device, Leandra’s Law increase the DUI penalties for commiting a DUI with a child passenger in the vehicle, and DUI while causing injury to a child passenger. Massachusetts already has laws which severely punish those who commit these offenses.

Leandra’s Law has been touted as one of the toughest DUI laws in the country. However, our Legislature may increase Massachusetts DUI penalties with the enactment of DUI laws which are being considered at the Statehouse.

Massachusetts ignition interlock device installation procedures

Under Melanie’s Law, all second or subsequent DUI offenders are required to have an approved ignition interlock device installed in any vehicle which the DUI offender owns, operates, or leases. This requirement applies to DUI suspensions which were imposed on or after January 1, 2006, the effective date of the ignition interlock provision of Melanie’s Law. Interlock devices produced by Consumer Safety Technology (CST), Draeger, Guardian, LifeSafer Interlock, Sens-O-Lock, and Smart Start.

Interlock is required for any hardship or full license issued as a result of a second or subsequent DUI offense. Ignition interlock required drivers must have the device installed for the entire term of anyhardship license and for a two year period after getting a full license reinstatement.

The ignition interlock installation is a multi-step process which begins with obtaining clearance to drive, either with a Massachusetts hardship or full license. This clearance is obtained by going to a hearing, either at the Registry of Motor Vehicles or Board of Appeal. Once the driver is approved for either a hardship or full license, the driver must go to the Registry of Motor Vehicles to begin the ignition interlock installation procedure. This process begins by meeting with a Registry Hearing Officer who will review the driver’s record and confirm that he or she is eligible for either a full license reinstatement or a hardship license.

Once the Registry Hearings Officer confirms eligibility, he or she will give the driver an “ignition interlock package.” This package contains forms and affidavits which must be signed in the presence of a notary public. Also included in this package is a list of approved ignition interlock instillation locations. The driver should select an ignition interlock vendor and bring his or her vehicle to the installation location so that the device can be installed. While the device is being installed, the user will receive training on how to operate the device.

Once installation is complete, the driver should bring proof of installation to a Registry of Motor Vehicles hearing officer. The hearing officer will then issue the driver a license with a Z (ignition interlock) restriction. The driver can now legally drive his or her interlock equipped motor vehicle.

In cases where the driver does not own a vehicle and/or needs to get insurance, he or she should have the vehicle towed to the installation facility or driven there with a general registration plate, such a dealer plate. The driver would then have the device installed, get his or her license reinstated by showing proof of installation to a RMV hearing officer, go to his or her insurance company with the RMV-1 form, show the insurance agent that he or she is now licensed, get the RMV-1 form stamped by the insurance company, go back to the RMV and get the vehicle registered, and finally return to the ignition interlock facility and put the new plates on the vehicle.

Interlock required drivers who live out of state can have the device removed, or not installed, so long as they prove out of state residency and sign an affidavit stating that they live out of state and will not drive in Massachusetts without the ignition interlock device.

For interlock-required drivers who live in Massachusetts, there are no absolutely exceptions or ways to avoid the ignition interlock device. If a driver is legally interlock required, he or she must have the device for a minimum of 2 years. If there are violations, the Registry will extend the interlock requirement for a minimum of 6 months.

Interlock required drivers must have the device inspected, maintained, and monitored monthly. If the results of the monthly monitoring show certain alcohol readings, the driver will be called into the Registry of Motor Vehicles for an interlock violation hearing, which could result in a 10 year or lifetime license suspension. If you are facing an ignition interlock violation, please contact me. I have an outstanding track record in the area of interlock violation appeals and I have proven that the ignition interlock device is unreliable and registers false positive readings.

 

Only 15 days to challenge Mass. Breathalyzer Refusal Suspensions

If you were arrested for DUI in Massachusetts and you refused to submit to a chemical breath test, it is absolutely critical that you contact a Massachusetts DUI Lawyer immediately. I say this because you only have 15 days to appeal most aspects of a breathalyzer refusal suspension.

Melanie’s Law dramatically increased Massachusetts breathalyzer refusal penalties so that your license or right to operate will be suspended for 180 days for a first offense DUI, 3 years for those under 21 years of age or for those with one prior DUI, 5 years for a 3rd offense, and lifetime for a 4th offense DUI.

Also, there is no guarantee that your breathalyzer refusal suspension will be vacated if you are found not guilty of DUI. This means that you may get an acquittal or dismissal of the DUI charge and still have to serve a license suspension ranging from 6 months to lifetime, depending on your record.

Chemical test refusals appeals must be filed within 15 calendar days of the date of arrest. This includes weekends and holidays. This 15 day period is jurisdictional and cannot be waived. Failing to file a breathalyzer refusal appeal with the Registry of Motor Vehicles within the 15 day appeal period can be a huge mistake, often with consequences which may last a lifetime. I have personally seen “slam dunk” winner breathalyzer refusal suspension appeals lost because the DUI defendant failed to appeal within the 15 day period. One of these resulted in a lifetime loss of license, with absolutely no ability to get a hardship license.

In subsequent offense DUI cases, the breathalyzer refusal period sometimes exceeds the DUI suspension period. For example, a 2nd offense DUI will result in a 3 year breathalyzer refusal suspension followed by a 2 year DUI suspension. A 4th offense DUI will result in a 10 year suspension for being convicted of DUI and a lifetime suspension for refusing the breath test. To make matters worse, in most cases, there is absolutely no ability to get a hardship, work, or Cindarella license during a breathazlyer refusal license suspension. Both the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles and theRMV Board of Appeal routinely refuse to issue hardship licenses during 3 year, 5 year, and lifetime CTR suspensions.

Many lawyers do not bother appealing breathalyzer refusal license suspensions. Not appealing is usually a mistake. There are numerous grounds upon which to challenge these administrative license suspensions. For a refusal to be valid, it must have been done in a very specific way, with certain rights provided. Also, it must be adequately documented by the police. Under the Massachusetts Breathalyzer Refusal Law, legal difficiences with the refusal will result in it being overturned. Although, in most cases, the Registry “rubber stamps” these refusals it is possible to win in District and Superior Court, so long as the original suspension appeal was field with the Mass. RMV within 15 days of the OUI arrest.

If your license was suspended for a breathalyzer refusal in Massachusetts, please contact me. I may be able to get you back on the road with a full license reinstatement, as I have done for numerous grateful clients in the past.

Upcoming DUI Checkpoint in Middlesex County, Mass.

The Massachusetts State Police, in partnership with a local police agency, will conduct a field sobrietyDUI roadblock on a secondary state highway in Middlesex County on during the evening of Saturday, December 19, 2009 into Sunday, December 20th.

The Mass. State Police are equipped with a mobile breathalyzer and OUI booking facility called the “BAT Mobile.” In accordance with judicially approved DUI roadblock procedures, state and local police officers will stop drivers to detect signs and symptoms of intoxication. Officers will have a brief conversation with the driver of the stopped vehicle, during which time they will be looking for slurred speech, glassy or bloodshot eyes, the odor of alcoholic beverages, open containers of alcohol, or any other indicators that the driver might be operating under the influence of intoxicants.

If the police suspect intoxication or other criminal activity, drivers will be directed to a “secondary screening area” where they will be ordered to produce a driver’s license and subjected to additional screening which may include standardized field sobriety tests.

Based on all of the facts and circumstances of the encounter, including the results of the field sobriety tests, the police will decide whether there is probable cause to arrest the driver for DUI. Anyone arrested will be booked and offered the opportunity to submit to a chemical breath test. The penalty for refusing is a license suspension ranging from 180 days to life. Those who are arrested and refuse will only have 15 days from the date of arrest to appeal the breathalyzer refusal suspension. Failure to appeal during the 15 day CTR appeal period will result in the inability to challenge many aspects of the refusal suspension.